November 5, 2008 at 7:00 am #28185
    Demure
    Participant
    @demure

    I’ve been thinking a lot about politics because of the U.S. Presidential election. (GO OBAMA!!!) Anyway… This post is for people to be very opinionated and open.

    If your President, Prime Minister, or King/Queen had visible body ink, do you think it would make a difference in how you viewed them? If yes, then why. If no then why not? If your country elects the leadership do you think the people would vote for someone who had tattoos? Would any political figure be accepted with visible body art?

    Answer now! Go go!

    November 7, 2008 at 1:31 am #55569
    Demure
    Participant
    @demure

    Okay so you guys suck…

    I’ll voice my opinion realistically then.

    If a person were running for President in my country with exposed tats I’d really be biased against him. I think the rest of the U.S. would be too. Our country is very conservative.

    November 7, 2008 at 9:20 pm #55586
    singidunum
    Participant
    @singidunum

    Winston Churchill had a tattoo on his arm. King Alexander of Yugoslavia had a large chest piece…and Roosevelt from memory…

    November 8, 2008 at 12:36 am #55588
    Demure
    Participant
    @demure

    really??? wow… do you have any pictures of what these looked like? I think that would be really kool to see.

    November 8, 2008 at 5:43 pm #55603
    singidunum
    Participant
    @singidunum

    http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/tattoo/celeb-alexandar.htm

    here’s the link to one, the rest i guess are there too…

    Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

    You must be logged in to create new topics.