I’d be more concerned with spending too little on a tattoo. Who is the artist doing the work? Can you link their portfolio? This way we can judge from their other work whether or not this is too expensive.

210£/3hours = 70£/hr….A lot of places in the states start at $150.00+/hr

@PJ95 147347 wrote:

so 70£ per hour is expensive for you? this tattoo is really meaningful for me.

70 per hour is very inexpensive IMO ,I paid $250 per hr for 9 hours on one tattoo a couple years ago.

maybe this will explain it better

70 pounds = about $100 that is cheap. I would be worried about the quality of the tattoo as ezrider asked can you put a link to the tattooists work? I’m sure top UK tattooists are charging about twice that.

@PJ95 147349 wrote:

I checked that in the UK 70£per hour is a top quality tattoo

Although there are obviously some correlations between price and quality, in as much as high quality artists are usually very busy and can afford to be both selective and pricey, but there is no way to say that X amount per hour equals Y quality tattoo. Some tattooers are fast and others are slow. Some charge more per hour and some charge less. Some charge per piece and not per hour.

70£ per hour does not guarantee you anything with regards to quality.
Please post some information on the tattooer, if you are truly interested in knowing whether they’re worth the money and your skin for the rest of your life.