@Original six 125684 wrote:

How! He comitted more crime over a longer period of time and killed more peoplle! Of course u can compare the two!!

Charles Manson never killed anybody he got other people to kill for him.

@Sam-I-Am 125694 wrote:

I’m basically not into portraits because I’ve seen too many poorly done, or nicely done that didn’t age well.

I would consider a full moon with Jackie Gleason’s caricature from the “Honeymooners” tv series.

Woah. You Are old.

@jerryatrophy 125714 wrote:

Woah. You Are old.

Only old enough to see the after midnight reruns on New York’s channel 11.

@GrayCatLove 125599 wrote:

It’s not well-done, but why anyone wants a tattoo of such a man is beyond me. Do explain.

This. ^
……………

@Original six 125628 wrote:

I dont condone or agree or defend what he did or didnt do. Im just fascinated with the phycolagy behibd all criminals and killers not just Manson. It intrests me. And to jusdge someone based on a tattoo is small minded.

Well you got Manson’s face. You didn’t get anything psychology related. You got a tribute tattoo to Manson and one of the most well known mass murder scenes of all time. You got it inked so don’t pussy out now. You’re going to regret this tattoo for one reason or another – whether it’s b/c it’s really poorly done or b/c of what it conveys to people. Good luck explaining this one to your future wife or kids.

And to the person who compared this to getting a Leatherface or devil tattoo … those are fictional characters. Maybe next he can get Gacy and he can explain how he isn’t paying tribute to a child molester.

Stick some overly happy go lucky, snow white type person next to that one and then let people choose which is more interesting 🙂