I am very self conscious about my mole on arm so I was thinking of getting a tattoo to cover it up. Will the tattoo be able to cover it up? I heard getting a tattoo was painful is it? I don’t know I’m just thinking out loud here what does everybody think.
Thanks very much.
you should just go get it removed from a dermatologist, it’s only like 20-50 to remove it, much cheaper than a tattoo!
80% of my back is covered in a REAL tribal, from my people. It hurt like hell on the spine and nape of my neck. On the arms i’m told is not NEARLY as painful.
I don’t know if they can actually just ink OVER a mole without ‘upsetting’ the mole and making it cancerous. Maybe you can just have the mole removed and then ink over the little scar.
Why not get the mole removed? It will hurt less than a tattoo and probably it is covered by your insurance.
eeew.. please dont
Don’t get a tattoo if your not 100000000% sure thats what you want cause its permanent,
i got a mole removed–totally painless, healed up great. not even expensive.
i AM a fan of tattoos, just fyi, but honestly, thats just probably not the way i’d go for a tattoo… just to cover somethin? nah. just remove the mark.
they dont tattoo over moles.
You must be logged in to create new topics.