@ArniVidar 131750 wrote:

I just think that despite the obviously abstract style of the painting, the artist was lacking the ability to reproduce details that should and could have been reproduced.
The blue mountains in the background, for instance, are bland and lacking definition.

The style is unique, the tattoo is unique, and you should wear it…

[Read more]

@jerryatrophy 131722 wrote:

I think it has the same spirit as the original and if you weren’t looking for photorealistic copy then I think its fine.
There’s not a whole lot to judge it off of since flaws that we look for don’t apply to abstract work. The shading could be a little better but once it heals u up it will probably blend out a bit. And…

[Read more]

Also, this was immediately after the tattoo was done and I was told it will look different once healed, would that make any difference?

I don’t think it’s quite as good, but I wasn’t expecting an exact representation, I didn’t even think one would be possible. I wish I had found these forums before, but I’m sure thousands of people have said that. I loved the original, and I was focused more on finding an artist who had done similar work in a tattoo than looking at their tattoo…[Read more]

Care to elaborate as to why? Since this was my first one I’m not entirely sure what to look for. I guess I’ll have to find another artist for my second although the choices are limited up here in alaska