maniacthw;89787 wrote:
If he’s not a beginner, then he’s not very good.

Sorry i’m confused – as i’m a bit new to this. So you’re saying that the quality of my tattoos, and the one i posted aren’t very good as opposed to this?

http://www.thetattooforum.com/album.php?albumid=4032&pictureid=9556

maniacthw;89783 wrote:
I used to be the same way and am sure most people started there. You just have to train your eye.

As for the tattoo, it looks like a new artist. Hey, they all start somewhere. If that’s the case, he did well for a beginner. The panthers aren’t HORRIBLE… But they’re not amazing either.

I wouldn’t say he’s a beginner,…[Read more]

Amok;89772 wrote:
Yes, art is subjective.

Indeed, but there is usually some sort of middle ground perhaps? I try to appreciate art as best as i can, even if it’s not my taste.

KnightHawk;89742 wrote:
Nope, just out of proportion and rather sucky. I’ve seen alot worse, but these ain’t nothing to be proud of.

Love. Peace. Metallica.

I’m open to opinions. But i’m not sure how worthwhile they are. No offence but i look at the majority of your ink and think, wtf, why would he get that…[Read more]

Dave Van;89720 wrote:
Have to agree there, not real impressed with #2 or #3. The first one looks pretty good, but you might want to go for a second sitting with a different artist on the other two.

You thinking cover up? I can live with 2 tbh. Possibly change 3.

Adler;89719 wrote:
The only one I like is the one on the back although the pictures aren’t very good. The other ones look off and out of proportion. The one on the chest doesn’t look like a panther at all and is overall pretty bad. Sorry dude, being honest.

No problems dude. I know the second one has strange proportions, but i kind of like it,…[Read more]

WardyInk;89657 wrote:
I like it dude!! looks cool:cool:

Cheers bro. I’ve been a bit worried about the panther on my chest- it’s a lot different to the other 2, i just didn’t want them all to look the same. Like i’m obsessed with panthers on roids lol.